Role for 11C-Choline PET in Active Surveillance of Prostate Cancer
Examined serial 11C-choline PET scans alongside biopsy and clinical monitoring in 24 patients on active surveillance for prostate cancer.
View on PubMed →Review Dr. William Makis’s peer-reviewed publications alongside clearly labeled external research on repurposed medicines and supportive-care supplements.
Published work examining cancer detection, staging, treatment response and clinically important incidental findings.
Case reports and clinical series involving 177Lu-DOTATATE PRRT and 131I-MIBG therapy.
Research on uncommon metastatic patterns, treatment responses and safety considerations.
Each entry links to its PubMed record. Study design is shown so readers can distinguish clinical research, retrospective studies, reviews, case series and individual case reports.
Examined serial 11C-choline PET scans alongside biopsy and clinical monitoring in 24 patients on active surveillance for prostate cancer.
View on PubMed →Reviewed 7,252 oncology PET/CT studies to examine the frequency, malignancy risk and interpretation of unexpected focal thyroid uptake.
View on PubMed →Reviewed PET/CT appearances and clinical considerations across malignant diseases affecting the pleura and pericardium.
View on PubMed →Reported cardiac metastatic disease identified in a review of 251 neuroendocrine-tumor patients treated with targeted radionuclide therapies.
View on PubMed →Described orbital metastases, imaging findings, management and treatment responses among patients with neuroendocrine tumors.
View on PubMed →Examined catecholamine crises, tumor lysis syndrome and the need for modified safety protocols during radionuclide therapy.
View on PubMed →Documented imaging and treatment response following induction and maintenance peptide receptor radionuclide therapy.
View on PubMed →Reported clinical and imaging observations from targeted radionuclide treatment of a patient with thymoma.
View on PubMed →Described the use of PET/CT to identify the primary renal tumor, stage metastatic disease and assess treatment response.
View on PubMed →These external studies cover research topics discussed by Dr. Makis. Dr. Makis is not listed as an author of the studies below. Preclinical findings in cells or animals cannot establish effectiveness in patients.
Laboratory and mouse-model research reported immune effects and synergy with checkpoint blockade. This was not a human efficacy trial.
View primary study →An individualized-dose phase IIa study found mebendazole generally tolerable, but the small cohort experienced rapid disease progression and the study did not establish anticancer effectiveness.
View primary study →Cell and animal experiments described microtubule disruption and other anticancer mechanisms. The study does not demonstrate safety or effectiveness as a human cancer treatment.
View primary study →Supplements can interact with chemotherapy, anticoagulants, surgery and organ function. These studies are presented for evidence review—not as a universal supplement protocol.
A 28-patient trial found the combination feasible and tolerable. The study was too small to confirm a survival benefit and requires larger trials.
View primary study →In the 25,871-participant VITAL trial, vitamin D supplementation did not significantly reduce the overall incidence of invasive cancer compared with placebo.
View primary study →The VITAL trial found that 1 gram daily of marine omega-3 fatty acids did not reduce invasive cancer incidence compared with placebo in a general-risk population.
View primary study →Nine women completed this small dose-escalation study after radiotherapy. It explored safety and immune markers, but was not designed to prove cancer-control benefit.
View primary study →Evidence strength, dose, formulation and patient context vary widely. Patients should review supplements with their oncology or medical team before use, particularly during active treatment.